About Pendragon and what we do
About the people at Pendragon
About our electronic information service
Pensions Surveys
How to contact us
Pendragon home page

Your one point of access to surveys, research and reports for the Pensions Professional

Searching for: researcher is "engineering employers federation (eef) and aon consulting"

Surveys listed in reverse order of publication date

Results 1-2 of 2.

Pension Protection Fund needs greater clarity
Views on the PPF of almost 50 large manufacturing companies with occupational schemes
Engineering Employers Federation (EEF) and Aon Consulting
Jul 2004 United Kingdom Pension Protection Fund
This survey analyses the views on the PPF of almost 50 of the UKs largest manufacturing companies with occupational pension schemes. Despite a high level of support in principle for the idea of the PPF, the survey shows that, as it is currently designed, there is still considerable confusion and uncertainty amongst employers about how the PPF will operate and the costs that they will incur. Until these are resolved, the researchers say it is clear that it will be very difficult for employers to give greater support to the PPF.

More details are generally available exclusively to subscribers of Perspective, the electronic pensions legal & regulatory information and news service. To read the summary, subscribers should launch Perspective and navigate via the Table of Documents to PensionSurveys >> Jul 2004 or click here (this link will not work in all circumstances). For further information about Perspective click here.

472444F1   Click here to contact the authors.
 
Survey of Manufacturing Companies
Pension arrangements in manufacturing companies
Engineering Employers Federation (EEF) and Aon Consulting
Dec 2002 United Kingdom Funding and Minimum Funding Requirement, Scheme Design (inc. DB & DC)
According to this survey of 559 companies, manufacturing companies have reluctantly accelerated the closure of their final salary pension schemes to both new and existing members over the last three years. Publishing the fings, the EEF is re-iterating its previous calls for a scheme specific funding standard to replace the Minimum Funding Requirement (MFR) and simplification of the complex legislation and taxation provisions that are making occupational pensions so expensive to provide.

More details are generally available exclusively to subscribers of Perspective, the electronic pensions legal & regulatory information and news service. To read the summary, subscribers should launch Perspective and navigate via the Table of Documents to PensionSurveys >> Dec 2002 or click here (this link will not work in all circumstances). For further information about Perspective click here.

4307943D   Click here to contact the authors.
 

Results 1-2 of 2.